The famous line
in one of the 1980s “Dirty Harry” movie goes, “Opinions are like pie-holes;
everybody has one,” or something like that. But what happens when people who
have a large public following push what they think and say about a topic as if
it’s more important than the topic itself, and do it in demeaning ways? That’s
seems to be the growing slant during television sporting events, political news
shows and other programming. It’s a poor commentary (excuse the pun) that has led
to deep-seated problems, especially among our youth.
This whole,
“I’m on TV, so what I’m saying is more important than what you’re thinking”
mentality is poisoning popular culture. A good deal of it occurs among
celebrity judges on reality shows, the kind where ‘ordinary people’ compete in
singing, dancing, cooking and other skills-based activities. TV and radio
sports commentators are also drifting beyond providing useful analysis,
information or personal asides and into poisonous second guessing.
There’s
mean-spiritedness going on; it is of a kind the public seems to accept. It’s
one thing to describe the action and break it down for folks to better
understand what’s happening during competitions. It’s quite another to lambast competitors
for their missteps and split second decision-making. This brand of armchair
quarterbacking used to be confined to game day tailgates or La-Z-Boy couch
potatoes ranting to their beer-drinking buddies. Now we’re forced to endure,
with growing regularity, commentators and reality show judges popping off about
players and participants like there’s no tomorrow. Oh yeah, it’s on Facebook
too but I digress…
I'm all for
learning and entertainment. The problem for me is that I really am not
interested in other people always telling me what I should be thinking.
Everyone has opinions and that's well and good. American Idol, America's Got
Talent, Dancing with the Stars. I'd like to believe most fans watch these shows
to celebrate emerging talent. Sadly, I've overheard water cooler commentary
bitterly ridiculing the previous night's contestants with all the immaturity
normally reserved for troubled middle school bus passengers.
However, I must
be in the minority about my dislike of all the, “Here’s what the contestant/player/coach/referee
did wrong and why,” pontificating. That’s because the networks conduct consumer
research and no doubt have data which support that the average viewer wants to be told what’s happening with cynical
opinions stated like fact.
To my mind,
there’s a declining beauty in games and competitions. Commentators and judges
show no mercy for imperfection and seem to relish pointing out the shortcomings
of participants. It’s like they’re judging the performance of robots and
blaming them for acting too much like human beings. The more venom the better
it seems, and it’s been seeping into our own personal commentary about each
other.
This mass media
habit of building up and then tearing down people has infected communities in
ways that hold far-reaching effects. To my mind, it’s time to turn sports and
other forms of competition toward more positive footing, on which the search
for excellence conspires to bring out the best in who we can be rather than
excessively seek out the worst.
Nobody’s
suggesting we ignore the mistakes, missteps and other nuances that make up
healthy competition. What I do believe is that our over analysis of each play and
player dehumanizes the participants. What does that say about how we might be
treating each other in our daily lives? More to the point, how does that
translate into how we feel about ourselves?
Then we wonder
where the whole bullying mentality in schools and at work comes from.
No comments:
Post a Comment