Now
he’s been fined nearly $8,000 by the NFL for unsportsmanlike conduct. That in
and of itself was not a bad thing. After all, taunting an opposing player after
the game and clutching your hands to your throat in a choking gesture is well,
unsportsmanlike. Problem is, it remains unclear if the NFL brass is punishing
Sherman for what he did on the field or off.
“He’s
a professional and should know better,” say armchair quarterbacks. I say he’s a
human being, not a robot. It’s not easy to gear up mentally and emotionally for
the mayhem we call football, then at game’s end instantaneously shut down all
that intensity. Remember, this isn’t arguing over the last cup of java in the
office. We’re talking a vocation in which physical pain and injury (sometimes broken
bones and concussions) happens with great regularity.
In
an arena where the object of the game for most latter day gladiators on the
field is to hit someone, it’s unreasonable to accept physical and verbal violence
on the part of the players during the game and then expect them to be humble
and always say the right thing after. It’s insane. It’s also dishonest, which
is part of what irks me during those player interviews.
A
lot of us forget that the young men playing this game are paid, in some cases
quite well to hurl their bodies into each other. Oh, football aficionados will
tell you the elements of brutality on the field are byproducts of the game,
rather than its goal, and a compelling argument can be made in that regard. At
the same time, it’s interesting how so many plays exhibiting the greatest
carnage seem to be replayed in sports highlights and You Tube.
For
his part, Sherman appreciated the implications of his actions. According to a
news report he said, “You're constantly learning and growing as a person,
learning about how the world works and how what you say and do affects people
and affects kids, especially. It's fun to learn new things about people, the
bad, the good, and to have that open dialogue.”
In
the end, it’s hypocritical what happened to this young man after he ‘lost it’ briefly
following the game. After all, minutes later when he was on camera again, he
was completely composed and gushing the boring complements and canned platitudes
expected from our gridiron gladiators.
Do
I condone Sherman’s conduct immediately following the game? No. Do I understand
it? In the context of a 25-year-old in heated competition, yes. What’s harder
to swallow were the assorted race-tinged posts and tweets Sherman received in
the wake of his short on-camera rant.
Sherman
never once cursed during his tirade and had appropriately recomposed himself lightning
fast. However, comments from disgruntled fans and others were less poised; they
hurled bigoted insults in his direction, using the N-word, likening the
ballplayer to a monkey and branding him a thug for his emotionally charged statement.
Funny how our deepest regard for people who are different from us surfaces in
times of high emotion or stress.
Too
bad Twitter, Facebook and the like can’t fine us when we ourselves cross the
line in social media and in public.